nanog mailing list archives
Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router
From: "Chris" <chris () bgpconsulting com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:07:35 -0400
The atm part is only the layer two core C&W and UUnet, both have ip on all core routers taking full bgp routes. Much like sprint has a POS core, but they still run ip over it. You have to have some kind of layer 2 core to run ip over so if you think about it every one has some kind of overlay model. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima () krioukov net> To: "Bora Akyol" <akyol () akyol org> Cc: "nanog" <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:54 PM Subject: RE: Running BGP4 on a Core Router
we can even imagine some core that is not ip core but, say, atm core and all lsrs are atm-lsrs. actually some providers (like c&w) have exactly this no ip core, overlay model. it's far from being the best one. -- dima.-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Bora Akyol Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 12:10 AM To: nanog Subject: Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Even with MPLS, you need to run some sort of a routing protocol. ISIS or OSPF with TE extensions would do. One can also use BGP with MPLS Label extensions as well. By the way, how does this work with route reflectors? Bora ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesper Skriver" <jesper () skriver dk> To: "HANSEN CHAN" <hansen.chan () alcatel com> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2000 8:20 PM Subject: Re: Running BGP4 on a Core RouterOn Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 07:49:37PM -0400, HANSEN CHAN wrote:Hi folks, I was hearing that typically BGP4 is run on all routers inside a
POP,
including access routers connecting to customers, border routers connecting other ISPs and core routers connecting to other POPs in
the
same network. I can understand why BGP4 is run on access and border routers. But running BGP4 on core routers is beyond my understanding. I thought
you
don't need to run BGP4 on core routers which are considered to be interior nodes. Can someone shed some light on what is the benefit of running BGP4
on
the core routers?If these routers run "normal" ip routing you have to, as each router does a lookup of the destination ip address of each packet, and
forward
it accordingly. If you run MPLS, you don't have to, as it uses labels to get to the next-hop router. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- Running BGP4 on a Core Router HANSEN CHAN (Jul 09)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Jesper Skriver (Jul 09)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Bora Akyol (Jul 09)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Jesper Skriver (Jul 10)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Dave Cooper (Jul 11)
- RE: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 11)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Chris (Jul 12)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Bora Akyol (Jul 09)
- RE: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 12)
- Re: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Jesper Skriver (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Running BGP4 on a Core Router Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 12)