nanog mailing list archives
Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]]
From: Joe Provo - Network Architect <joe.provo () rcn com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 18:02:00 -0400
[Note reply-to is not the list; see nanog archives for more orbs discussion] On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 01:22:01PM -0700, Eric A. Hall wrote: [snip]
I don't know if you actually went out of your way to misrepresent my comments or if it was accidental. Either way, you're wrong again: The 'service' they provide is a database of VERIFIED open relays. It is a damn good service and is very a useful tool in the arsenal.
ORBS is a well-documented spite list, among other things. Networks are listed for requesting that they not be probed, regardless of their status, among other behaviors. The mere fact that un-requested and un-provoke probes are issued at whim is alarming net.abuse, IMNSHO, and the only marginally relevant portion of this particular offshoot thread. Cheers, Joe -- Joe Provo Voice 508.486.7471 Director, Internet Planning & Design Fax 508.229.2375 Network Deployment & Management, RCN <joe.provo () rcn com>
Current thread:
- Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?] rdobbins (Jul 08)
- No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Eric A. Hall (Jul 08)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Joe Provo - Network Architect (Jul 08)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] JP Donnio (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Pim van Riezen (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Peter van Dijk (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] JP Donnio (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Pim van Riezen (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic,please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] JP Donnio (Jul 09)
- Re: No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic,please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] John Payne (Jul 09)
- No, ORBS is a good tool [WAS: Alright, ORBS sucks - next topic, please ;) [was RE: RBL-type BGPservice for known rogue networks?]] Eric A. Hall (Jul 08)