nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICMP rate limiting on EGRESS (Warning, operational content inside)


From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:37:20 -0700 (MST)



It is reasonably well acknowledge that ratelimiting ICMP on *ingress*
to your network can be a good thing to do, if you have available
resources to do it.

How about players rate-limiting ICMP on *egress* of the network over
public exchange points. I have been on the wrong end of several
smurfs over 100Mb/s over MAE-East & West, as, I'm sure have others.
Whenever anyone is smurfed like this, I presume their port blocks,
and anyone sending them data has head of line blocking. Which means,
in effect, anyone peering with anyone who is being (sufficiently
smurfed) will experience packet loss to *other* peers.

DOesn't work.

Cisco decided that wasn't the best application for it so egress is
MONUMENTALLY innefficient and cpu intensive. (bye, bye little router)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne Bouchard                                    [Immagine Your    ]
web () typo org                                      [Company Name Here]
Network Engineer

----------------------------------------------------------------------



Current thread: