nanog mailing list archives
Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay
From: Michael Shields <shields () msrl com>
Date: 11 Jan 2000 14:48:07 +0000
In article <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000110222525.438A-100000 () workhorse iMach com>, "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc () iMach com> wrote:
I'm going to make a pitch for the IP-address based method. Specifically, if you have a set of well known IP addresses for common services, thus something like: 223.255.255.1 - Primary DNS 223.255.255.2 - Secondary DNS 223.255.255.3 - SMTP Mail 223.255.255.4 - Time Server
Why did you choose to have exactly 2 DNS servers and exactly 1 SMTP and "time" server? -- Shields.
Current thread:
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay, (continued)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay bmanning (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Forrest W. Christian (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Joe Abley (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Brandon Ross (Jan 10)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Forrest W. Christian (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Brandon Ross (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Forrest W. Christian (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Steve Sobol (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay jlewis (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Michael Shields (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay jlewis (Jan 11)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Jeff Mcadams (Jan 12)
- Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay Adrian Chadd (Jan 13)