nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam, Law and Reality


From: "Charles E. Yow, Esq." <CYow () GulfSouthY2k com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 16:53:21 -0500


That is fantastic.

----- Original Message -----
From: John S. Quarterman <jsq () mids org>
To: Charles E. Yow, Esq. <CYow () GulfSouthY2k com>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Spam, Law and Reality



The spam issue is serous no doubt, but unless everyone understands the
implications of attempting to apply U.S. law to please understand some
basic
concepts and reality.  First the alleged violation has to be according to
the letter of the law that is being applied, exactly by the letter of the
law.  Lets be very realistic, do we really want to seek to apply U.S. law
to
those outside the U.S?  If this is the case then the end result could be
the
reverse, perhaps China would seek to apply Chinese law to American ISP's,
network administrators, the end result being Americans who have never been
to China being sentenced to life in prison or to death for posting matters
the Chinese Government considers offensive.  The witch hunt I see to
address
spamming is illogical and futile.  Let me be very blunt, until someone is
willing to take action all this talk about dealing with spammers is nothing
more than saber rattling and is useless.  I am an attorney in
Massachusetts,
and my experience is people get upset about spam and without exception no
one is willing to follow through, I used to be willing to deal with
spammers
pro bono, but having been burned more than enough times by people "getting
over it" that has passed.  Talk is cheap.

We sued and won,
 http://www.mids.org/nospam/

but the spammer in question was inside the U.S.,
and I certainly understand your point of view.

John S. Quarterman <jsq () mids org>






Current thread: