nanog mailing list archives
RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:59:44 -0500
At 10:45 PM 02/28/2000 -0500, Vijay Gill wrote:
Routers from Cisco and other vendors have the ability to detect the signature patterns of a denial-of-service attack, and the routers can filter out that traffic, Farnsworth said.
An unfortunate misquote. Add another scar to my cisco skin... - paul
Current thread:
- DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Feb 28)
- Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Richard Steenbergen (Feb 28)
- [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Paul Ferguson (Feb 28)
- RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Feb 28)
- RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Paul Ferguson (Feb 28)
- RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Vijay Gill (Feb 28)
- Message not available
- RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Paul Ferguson (Feb 28)
- Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 28)
- RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Feb 28)
- Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Richard Steenbergen (Feb 28)
- Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow Paul Ferguson (Feb 28)