nanog mailing list archives
Re: and we worry about route table bloat with micro-alloc ????
From: Randy Bush <rbush () bainbridge verio net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 06:55:11 -0800
*> 12.2.19.0/25 166.48.176.25 0 3561 11277 i *> 12.16.207.0/25 166.48.176.25 0 3561 7217 i
funny, we don't see that in our routers. Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i12.0.0.0 129.250.9.50 2147483647 100 0 7018 i *>i 192.205.31.201 2147483647 100 0 7018 i * i 129.250.0.13 2147483647 100 0 7018 i * i12.13.224.0/19 129.250.9.50 2147483647 100 0 7018 196 i *>i 192.205.31.201 2147483647 100 0 7018 196 i * i 129.250.0.13 2147483647 100 0 7018 196 i i wonder why. :-) randy
Current thread:
- and we worry about route table bloat with micro-alloc ???? John M. Brown (Feb 18)
- Re: and we worry about route table bloat with micro-alloc ???? Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: and we worry about route table bloat with micro-alloc ???? Josh Richards (Feb 24)