nanog mailing list archives

Re: SERVER NAMES


From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:13:05 -0800 (PST)


On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 owen () exodus net wrote:


OK... Now it's crossed into the arena of my pet peeves, so I'll vent my
opinion...


I believe that most machines should have at least two names...

      mx1 mx2 mx3... should be assigned as CNAME records to the
                      actual machine name (see below) that the
                      machine currently performing that function
                      is known by.

Hmmmm... MX records are CNAMES? Doesn't that cause problems with a certain
popular MTA?


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell                          
                       Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/




Current thread: