nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 21:21:23 -0500
At 09:18 PM 02/12/2000 -0500, jlixfeld () idirect com wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it has the potential to cause more damage than anything else if you network routes asynchronously. I turned it on a while ago and noticed my in and outbound traffic dropped by about 60%. I'm sure that the 60% drop in traffic had to do with traffic coming into the network on one interface and being local pref'd out a different interface. Because of the asynchronous routing, it's useless in my environment, unless there is a knob that doesn't cause it to break under these circumstances. If not, would this feature not be best suited for ISPs who are not in a BGP relationship with their upstreams?
Like everything else, it depends. There's always RFC2267. - paul
Current thread:
- Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path trall (Feb 12)
- Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Paul Ferguson (Feb 12)
- Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Craig A. Huegen (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Paul Ferguson (Feb 14)
- Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Paul Ferguson (Feb 12)
- Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Mark Prior (Feb 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Paul Ferguson (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
- Message not available