nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
From: Sam Thomas <sthomas () lart net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 01:22:01 +0000
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 04:18:16PM -0800, I Am Not An Isp wrote:
At 06:59 PM 2/8/00 -0500, Paul Ferguson wrote: >See: > > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-1544910.html?dtn.head I thought the whole point of NANOG was to give the Internet a break - 'cause lord knows it breaks every NANOG....
not true. we here at $ISP have found that having our engineers out of town and watching boring powerpoint presentations all day actually enhances network performance and availability. ;-) -- Sam Thomas Geek Mercenary
Current thread:
- NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Paul Ferguson (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... I Am Not An Isp (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Sam Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Christian Nielsen (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Charles Sprickman (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Craig A. Huegen (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Forrest W. Christian (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Paul Ferguson (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Paul Ferguson (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Charles Sprickman (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... I Am Not An Isp (Feb 08)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Shawn McMahon (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Dan Hollis (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Joe Shaw (Feb 09)