nanog mailing list archives

Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?

From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:49:31 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)




He said 'density'.

16 ports (is that right?) of OC48 in a single rack is the opposite of
'density'.

My company (Marconi) makes such a switch:

      http://www.marconi.com/html/solutions/asx4000.htm

Non-blocking OC-48c ATM interfaces have been shipping for some time now.

-- David

Current thread:

Where are ATM NAPs going? Ben Buxton (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Jay Ford (Dec 18)
  - RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Christian Kuhtz (Dec 18)
    - RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Jay Ford (Dec 18)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Reid Knuttila (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
  - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? David Charlap (Dec 18)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Alex Rubenstein (Dec 19)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 19)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
  - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 18)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Sean Donelan (Dec 18)
  - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 18)
  - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Omachonu Ogali (Dec 19)
    - Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)

(Thread continues...)