nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pinging routers for network status
From: "Miguel A.L. Paraz" <map () internet org ph>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:38:23 +0800
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:12:17AM -0800, Matt Levine wrote:
Well, although there's no entirely fool-proof way, We've found a better way of monitoring "real" outages/issues is to monitor the time required to setup a tcp connection to some "trusted" machines. For example, in our VA datacenter we monitor the time required to setup a connection with tier1 providers (UU,BBN,DIGEX for example) nameservers (on port 53).. We've found it slightly more reliable than ICMP reqs, especially since when routers get busy, it shows as degradation vs. outage.
How does your "DNS ping" work, do you just open and close a TCP connection? Or make actual requests? Like, "dig soa provider.net @ns.provider.net". But perhaps if everyone starts doing this to the same box, it could be seen as DoS? -- http://www.internet.org.ph Internet and ISP's in the Philippines http://www.ASARproject.org Artists for Social Action and Response GSM Mobile: +63-917-810-9728
Current thread:
- Pinging routers for network status Sean Donelan (Dec 17)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Paul Vixie (Dec 18)
- RE: Pinging routers for network status Matt Levine (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Miguel A.L. Paraz (Dec 18)
- RE: Pinging routers for network status Matt Levine (Dec 18)
- RE: Pinging routers for network status Matt Levine (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Paul Vixie (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status John M . Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status Steven J. Sobol (Dec 18)
- RE: Pinging routers for network status Jason Lewis (Dec 19)
- Re: Pinging routers for network status John M . Brown (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Pinging routers for network status Blaine Christian (Dec 18)