nanog mailing list archives

Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento?


From: <nanog () rmrf net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:15:28 -0600 (CST)


We at SAVVIS run continous pings to every backbone router that we
own.  (John - this does not include our ATM switches, we have no way to
monitor latency between them).  But if, say, our connection to Sprint or
UUNET let's say, is latent,  we would get UUNet on the phone
immediateley.  (ph is 800-900-0241, for those that don't wanna look it up,
choose the appropiate options.  Unfortuantely the multi-meg option
(read: no hold time and clueful people) is password protected and I am
obviously not at liberty to give that out).  At any rate, we do notice
latency, and if it's persistent enough, we do something about it.... 

Obviously *not* speaking as a SAVVIS represenative.....

Jon


On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, John Fraizer wrote:



Alternatively, you could expect that the carrier might notice themself
that there is a problem.

Nah.... Forget I mentioned that.  It'll never happen.

---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc


On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:


Alternately you could call the UUNET NOC at the number listed on this
public page:
http://www.us.uu.net/support/noc/

--Chris

#######################################################
## UUNET Technologies, Inc.                          ##
## Manager                                       ##
## Customer Router Security Engineering Team         ##
## (W)703-289-8479 (C)703-283-3734               ##
#######################################################

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Randy Bush wrote:


Heya, I'm getting a huge jump in ping times from alter.net to Verio in what
appears to be Sacramento:

horrifying that neither of these providers don't have nocs, eh?  sheesh!

randy









Current thread: