nanog mailing list archives

Re: Qwest/forthelife.net rfc1918 goodness


From: Alex Pilosov <alex () pilosoft com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:15:50 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mark Mentovai wrote:

I used to think that this was wrong also, and I would never build a
network like that, but aside from making for ugly traceroutes, there's
really nothing wrong with it.  RFC 1918 doesn't address this issue

It, together with a martian ingress-filters break PMTU-D _IF_ any of the
links between these routers has MTU less than 1500. This topic pops up on
nanog every 4-6 months, but I doubt that it'll make home.net or qwest
change their addressing schemes.

--
Alex Pilosov            | http://www.acecape.com/dsl
CTO - Acecape, Inc.     | AceDSL:The best ADSL in Bell Atlantic area
325 W 38 St. Suite 1005 | (Stealth Marketing Works! :)
New York, NY 10018      |




Current thread: