nanog mailing list archives
Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS"
From: "Derek J. Balling" <dredd () megacity org>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:35:00 -0700
At 12:15 PM -0700 8/25/00, Sean Donelan wrote:
How many queries do those four servers normally handle?
Using the most basic of logic (slightly flawed admittedly)... r = number of daily root-server .com requests t = total number of root-servers b = 4 (number of bad root servers) (b/t)*rNow, since I'm suspecting that "r" is a sufficiently high value, I would say it would not be "negligible".
If it was "negligible" and "users would not notice", then it wouldn't have been reported to NSI, as we are all end-users of their system, and we noticed. :)
But a press release should keep close to what happened.
... and not an outright lie? ;-) Sounds like NSI is starting to take some pointers from the Microsoft School of Press Releases.... ;-)
d
Current thread:
- Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Verd, Brad (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Greg A. Woods (Aug 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Kai Schlichting (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Sean Donelan (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Derek J. Balling (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Sean Donelan (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Derek J. Balling (Aug 25)
- Re: Follow-up to "ROOT SERVERS" Brett Frankenberger (Aug 26)