nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering Table Question


From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 06:39:40 -0700


At 10:21 AM 4/21/00 -0500, Mark Borchers wrote:
>
>You omitted the fact that the 1500 byte packets carry a bunch
>of paid advertising, and thus are already revenue-producing.

And you omitted the fact that the 64 byte ACKs carry traffic by paying customers, and thus are already revenue-producing.

Does the fact that both networks are being paid by their customers mean that neither should pay the other? Or that one should always pay the other?

TTFN,
patrick

--
  I Am Not An Isp - www.ianai.net
  ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
  "Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle
  (Enable?  We dunt need no stinkin' enable!!)




Current thread: