nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Table Question
From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 01:29:28 -0700
At 05:28 PM 4/19/00 -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > >> A large file of baseline traceroutes could replace the benefits of >> disclosure, I suppose. > >if it could, many of us would beg someone to do it RIGOROUSLY and publish. [...] > o and it still would not tell you who is paying whom when it is peeringWhat has that got to do with *operational* benefits. And why would it make any difference to a traceroute?
>randy TTFN, patrick -- I Am Not An Isp - www.ianai.net ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com> "Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle (Enable? We dunt need no stinkin' enable!!)
Current thread:
- Re: Peering Table Question, (continued)
- Re: Peering Table Question Peter Galbavy (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 24)
- RE: Peering Table Question Marcellus Smith (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question k claffy (Apr 24)
- Re: Peering Table Question Larry Snyder (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question Randy Bush (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering Table Question I Am Not An Isp (Apr 20)
- Re: Peering Table Question David Diaz (Apr 25)
- Re: Peering Table Question Christian Nielsen (Apr 25)
- Re: Peering Table Question David Diaz (Apr 24)