nanog mailing list archives

Re: NetSol screwing the pooch?


From: Alex Pilosov <alex () pilosoft com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:05:33 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Vadim Antonov wrote:

There is no need for independent registries.  Customers wishing to
register a domain should simply talk to their ISPs whose personnel can
then go and update the consortium-owned database.  Oh, and BTW, they
_already_ have the contact info for their customers, so they do not
depend on the NSI-claimed "ownership" of that information.  And,
unlike NSI or other registries, they can actually verify that
information - and they have a pretty simple method of dealing with
abusive customers.

This approach scales, it can improve domain-related customer service
by an order of magnitude, and it does not require any political games.  
Despite the cut-throat competition in the market, ISPs managed to
maintain a coherent and functioning global routing infrastructure.  
The DNS is as essential for their customers as the actual packet
transport; so i think it is time for competent people to take over it,
too.

Problems: 
1. You'll have two databases, one maintained by consortium, and one
maintained by NSI/other registrars. I suppose you can say 'consortium data
takes priority' on consortium's root servers, however, what will happen
when data begins to diverge? Example: Domain expires in NSI db, gets
deleted, someone else takes it in NSI database. You have then to
mirror NSI changes...Its gets very ugly very fast.

2. Last attempts to do things like these (by edns, alternic) were fraught
with personality clashes among its founders, and ended badly (servers
brought down, and ISPs who were persuaded to point their roots at these
servers had to back out the changes).

Of course, one can say that they failed because they tried to _extend_ the
namespace, not just manage it. Who knows...

3. The other thing is that anything involving DNS governance is a dirty
business, and everyone who attempted to get involved in it doesn't want to
touch it again :)

(I'm sure Randy will make comment here ;)


-alex




Current thread: