nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS for 16.172.in-addr.arpa
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:59:21 -0400
We were having a small problem here and I traced it down to a reverse DNS lookup on a 172.16 address hanging.
hmm...yeah. they'll do that.
I noticed that a.root-servers.net reports that BLACKHOLE.ISI.EDU is authoritative for 16.172.in-addr.arpa. Is this the way it should be, or is the yet another network solutions mistake? Who should really handle DNS for rfc1918 addresses?
well...imho, they should be delegated to localhost. and everyone should have a localhost zone with the proper address in it, to go with their 127.in-addr.arpa zone file. but then again, some people think i'm weird. -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- DNS for 16.172.in-addr.arpa grisha (Oct 21)
- Re: DNS for 16.172.in-addr.arpa bmanning (Oct 21)
- Re: DNS for 16.172.in-addr.arpa Andrew Brown (Oct 21)
- Re: DNS for 16.172.in-addr.arpa bmanning (Oct 21)