nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smurf tone down
From: Havard.Eidnes () runit sintef no
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 21:48:26 +0200
3) Can't manage it. Providers are understaffed with clueful people.Is this really that hard? access-list 175 permit icmp any any int bleh/bleh rate-limit input access-group 175 128000 8000 8000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop rate-limit output access-group 175 128000 8000 8000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
I agree, the above isn't all that hard. However, I'd argue that the above is in some sense wrong. There's no need to put all ICMP traffic in the same basket; some ICMP traffic is required for e.g. path MTU discovery to work. So, instead I'd use access-list 175 permit icmp any any echo-reply But you all knew that already, right? ;-) - HÃ¥vard
Current thread:
- Re: Smurf tone down, (continued)
- Re: Smurf tone down Jan Ahrent Czmok (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down alex (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Leo Bicknell (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down alex (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Tim Winders (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down alex (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Leo Bicknell (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Stephen Stuart (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Leo Bicknell (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down bmanning (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down alex (May 01)
- Re: Smurf tone down Havard . Eidnes (May 03)
- Re: Smurf tone down sthaug (May 03)
- Re: Smurf tone down Havard . Eidnes (May 05)