nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS?
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 12:08:45 -0700
Clark Gaylord <cgaylord () cns vt edu> wrote:
I doubt that evan Vadim is ignorant enough to be saying ATM never worked ... not the usual statement one would make of the default campus core technology.
The last time i checked the default campus core technology was Ethernet. Anyway, there's a saying at NASA (thanks, Milo :) that given enough thrust even pigs can fly. What i said is not that ATM cannot be made to work in some limited environments, but rather that it is going to the junkyard of overhyped technologies which tured out to be more expensive and less reliable than simpler and dumber rivals. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS?, (continued)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alan Hannan (May 18)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Nick Bastin (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Jeremy Porter (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Prabhu Kavi (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Sean Donelan (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Andrew Odlyzko (May 19)
- RE: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Hank Nussbacher (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Alex P. Rudnev (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Vadim Antonov (May 19)
- Re: Is anyone actually USING IP QoS? Neil J. McRae (May 19)