nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root servers and transition
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:37:14 -0800
On 03/26/99, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg () ripe net> wrote:
> "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org> writes: > > But, would it really go that smoothly? How long can the root > servers last without an A? A very long time. Certainly long enough as to not affect Internet stability.
That's the answer that I'm sure we were all looking for (and even expecting), but it had to be asked.... On 03/26/99, Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM> wrote:
The zone files would be frozen at the last update until a new zone generation process was implemented. With NSI's latest pronouncements, this gets into the political realm. So I'll just leave it at that.
[ . . . ]
Ceasing to function is really the easy case. The hard one is if the data is corrupted or otherwise made unusable. I don't know what proceedures the root zone operators have in place to "roll-back" zone files to an earlier version in case of corruption happening at the same time Network Solutions becomes unavailable.
Good question...not to put y'all on the spot or anything, but do any of the root server operators already have some procedures in place for such an occurance? ---------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cybernothing org> =========--------- | "Confusion is mightier than the sword." | | - Abbie Hoffman | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----
Current thread:
- Root servers and transition Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
- Re: Root servers and transition J.D. Falk (Mar 26)
- Re: Root servers and transition Bruce Campbell (Mar 27)
- Re: Root servers and transition J.D. Falk (Mar 27)
- Re: Root servers and transition Bruce Campbell (Mar 27)
- Re: Root servers and transition J.D. Falk (Mar 26)