nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route-Reflector Redundancy
From: Steve Carter <scarter () pobox com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:44:12 -0700
Brandon Applegate wrote:
In a redundant RR design, I have several questions that don't seem to be clearly covered in RFC1966. 1) Does a given route-reflector have to peer with the other route-reflectors in its own cluster ??
Yes. All route-reflector servers within your network should be fully meshed.
2) If yes to 1), do the RRs in the cluster peer with each other as clients or non-clients ??
All route-reflector servers peer as non-clients.
Above and beyond all of the above (actually depending on all of the above :) ), if my client router hears something from RR1, will it also hear it from RR2 ?? Is there a race condition ?
Read BGP 101. A client router is just like any other BGP router, the protocol allows for a BGP router to hear multiple announcements for the same destination. The router will choose the best destination based on the usual BGP decision rules. -Steve
Current thread:
- Route-Reflector Redundancy Brandon Applegate (Jun 29)
- Re: Route-Reflector Redundancy Steve Carter (Jun 29)
- Re: Route-Reflector Redundancy Andrew R Frame (Jun 29)