nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco TAC KRAP !!


From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:16:05 +0400 (MSD)


It's the real life - you became skilled, and technical support (of any 
company) rotate and can't be skilled enougph. Cisco DID the rigth thing - 
they create CCO.

Through we sometimes have got real support from the local cisco people 
(not from the Cisco Russia but from some other companies specialised by 
CISCO). Sometimes we did not. And I never had an illusions about TAC - if 
you are not hight-priority customer or CCIE yourself, you have nit a 
chance to contact really skilled people by TAC.

Nothing strange.


On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, TOO MUCH wrote:

Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:43:35 PDT
From: TOO MUCH <phantom2005 () hotmail com>
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Cisco TAC KRAP !!


Over the last year it seems that the quality of service I have received from 
TAC has diminished. At one time I found myself speaking to a knowledgeable 
engineer. Who knew the product and protocols involved and they were willing 
to share information.

The norm these days is to get an engineer who knows less then I do. I'm call 
requesting technical information pertaining to their products, What I get is 
some clown telling me to hold on while he surfs the internal web page 
looking for the answer. I can scan CCO myself!!

Is it just me ?

Phantom hates Cisco or should I say Sissy-Co TAC!!


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)




Current thread: