nanog mailing list archives

RE: This is not good news.


From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:31:14 -0700


Hank,
This is off-topic for NANOG. But, while you are not completely wrong,
you are not properly informed either. New top-level domains are NOT
strictly administrative. If they were, or the root-servers were, we'd
have had them over two years ago. Switch off your flame-thrower and come
and join the festivities on the DOMAIN-POLICY list. Dean Robb did.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 1:52 AM
To: linneweh () concentric net; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: This is not good news.



At 15:38 23/06/99 -0700, Henry R. Linneweh wrote:

Betsy Hart: Shadowy group is taking control of Internet!
http://www.azstarnet.com/public/dnews/0623CV2.html

Imposition of taxes and other power plays. Seems like history
repeating itself and setting a dangerous precedent.

Taxation of the network and making US citizens bare
the brunt of the cost is UNACCEPTABLE PERIOD.

Increasing rates to ISP's and backbone providers is
and reverse method of taxation on the consumer in
the end for government benefit,
UNACCEPTABLE PERIOD.

<flame>
Oh please!  NSI is playing every one of you for saps.  Follow
the money.
Who is making money right now by the delay?  Not ICANN.  A
tax?  You have
got to be kidding.  It is a cost to cover expenses - might be
$.50, might
even $.30.  Go ahead - put a cap put on the cost of running
ICANN.  Build a
different cost model to support the operation of ICANN.  Oh
wait - ARIN has
one.  No one calls the fee ISPs pay ARIN - a form of
taxation.  Calling it
a tax is playing into NSI's hands.

Internet governance?  Another nice buzzword thrown around to
make people
shy away from ICANN.  ICANN has nothing to do with
encryption, copyright,
taxation, censorship, etc.  Those who want to torpedo ICANN
and to put the
whole process back by 2 years - want you to think that ICANN
can and will
do all those things.  Assigning domain names is
administrative.  Don't let
anyone convince you otherwise.  You don't like cybersquatters
or trademark
bandits?  Take them to court.  Leave ICANN (and NSI for that
matter) out of
it.
</flame>

-Hank



Henry









Current thread: