nanog mailing list archives
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Unless someone knows differently, the renumbering at AADS been called off. (Enough people signed up to pay for the space, independent of AADS operations) At least, this is true according to Bill Manning. (As if *he* knows anything ;) . Ciaou .
Indeed. The view from here is that one of the participants at the AADS exchange agreed to sign the acceptable use paperwork, which was the gist of the problem I had with the current situation. That taken care of, the prefix 198.32.130.0/24 is good for use at the AADS exchange. This does not preclude AADS from implementing a renumbering plan for its clients. It is then up to the clients to determine which/ how many prefixes they intend to use. Also note. There is -NOT- payment for address space. There are costs associated with doing delegation and those costs have to be recovered somewhere.
Current thread:
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications, (continued)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Stephen Stuart (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Alan Hannan (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Jessica Yu (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Abha Ahuja (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Richard Irving (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Kevin Oberman (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications bmanning (Jan 25)