nanog mailing list archives
Re: latency vs. packet loss
From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:05:30 +0000
Jon,
How well does latency correlate to packet loss on the Internet? For example, if one were to pick one of several randomly placed sites on the net based on lowest latency to/from point x, what percentage of this time would this also yield the site with the lowest packet loss to/from point x? My guess is that the correlation is high (due to typical buffer sizes).
Remember latency is also affected by other things, like distance (you won't get less than 70ms RTT NY<->Lon even on an empty STM-1), and to some extent things like line speed and traffic shaping (your 50 byte ping on a 1kb/s (empty) circuit will take 2*50*8/1000 = almost a second) to transmit. But this is stating the obvious. Also note there are some conditions which cause packet loss which won't cause ICMP latency (line errors, various IXP overload conditions etc.). -- Alex Bligh GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)
Current thread:
- latency vs. packet loss Jon Zeeff (Jan 13)
- Re: latency vs. packet loss Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: latency vs. packet loss Jon Zeeff (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: latency vs. packet loss Martin, Christian (Jan 13)
- Re: latency vs. packet loss Alex Bligh (Jan 14)