nanog mailing list archives
RE: Smurfing and IP filtering
From: Scott McGrath <SMcGrath () YBP com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 21:54:59 -0500
Both would be a good idea as it would cover all the bases for most network operators
-----Original Message----- From: Steven J. Sobol [SMTP:sjsobol () nacs net] Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 9:50 PM To: Scott McGrath Cc: Chris Cook; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Smurfing and IP filtering On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 02:19:47PM -0500, Scott McGrath wrote:That would be a good starting point for the more sophisticated usershowevermost small networks have very uneven clue distribution so I believe something in a FAQ format would be more approachable to the small ISP/Network operator...why not both? Cover configuration for, say, the top 5 brands of routers (which, realistically, should cover the majority of ISP's out there...) -- Steve Sobol [sjsobol () nacs net] Part-time Support Droid [support () nacs net] NACS Spaminator [abuse () nacs net] Proud resident of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, the coolest place on earth. http://www.ClevelandHeights.com
Current thread:
- Smurfing and IP filtering Scott McGrath (Jan 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Smurfing and IP filtering Scott McGrath (Jan 13)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Steven J. Sobol (Jan 13)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Steven J. Sobol (Jan 14)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Steven J. Sobol (Jan 13)
- RE: Smurfing and IP filtering Scott McGrath (Jan 13)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Jeff Mcadams (Jan 14)
- Re: Smurfing and IP filtering Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 14)