nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop
From: Danny McPherson <danny () qwest net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 19:19:53 -0700
There are ways to get around this (as-path filtering, maximum-paths, etc) that aren't as nazi as one would hope, but will prevent stupidity and provide sanity checking.Maximum paths deals primarily with ibgpWell, thats patently wrong. I don't know how else to respond to this.
It's actually "maximum-prefix" in Cisco parlance, perhaps this introduced the confusion. As for Verio's policy of filtering based on registry allocations, I know of several other providers that implement it as well, and have for quite a while. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop, (continued)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Travis Pugh (Dec 04)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop James Smith (Dec 04)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Travis Pugh (Dec 04)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 05)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Travis Pugh (Dec 05)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Randy Bush (Dec 05)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 05)
- Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop Tim Wolfe (Dec 03)
- RE: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop jlewis (Dec 04)