nanog mailing list archives
Re: More Specifics of Classful Nets
From: Tim Wolfe <tim () clipper net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:13:15 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Steve E. Powell wrote:
What if the operator had the capability to accept routes based on the ratio of good prefixes to bad prefixes received where a bad prefix is defined as a more specific of a classful network or a
So Provider A announces his ten /15 CIDR blocks to Provider B, aggregating huge numbers of IPs into those ten announcements. He then wishes to announce 20 "bad" prefixes from customers of /21 or longer. Under your plan, that doesn't fly. Why is it that we assume that a "large" provider has to be announcing many routes? -- Tim -------------------------------------------------- * Timothy M. Wolfe, Chief Network Engineer * * ClipperNet Corporation / It's a wireless world * * tim () clipper net 800.338.2629 x 402 * * Sufficient for today = Inadequate for tomorrow * --------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- More Specifics of Classful Nets Steve E. Powell (Dec 06)
- Re: More Specifics of Classful Nets Tim Wolfe (Dec 06)
- Re: More Specifics of Classful Nets Daniel Golding (Dec 06)
- Re: More Specifics of Classful Nets Tim Wolfe (Dec 06)