nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 11:00:53 -0800
No, but it depends on the capacity requirements. We looked into self-homed vs. colo. Given that; 1) Most eCommerce projects need to be completed inside of six months. 2) Connectivity needs to happen in the first 3 weeks of project kick-off. 3) Telco WAN circuit delivery, for large capacity, takes anywhere from 6 to 18 weeks per circuit (depending on RBOC ... could be MUCH longer). 4) Facility build-out takes even longer (3 to 6 months). For large capacity sites, colo is the only way, with potential self-homing within two years. It just can't happen faster than that. Also, smaller providers are out, because of public peering point congestion and that is usually their only avenue. Large providers, with their own private dark-fiber network, leaving only last-mile traffic to the public Internet, appears to be the only way to go <sigh>.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Alex Rubenstein Sent: Sunday, December 05, 1999 9:54 AM To: Dana Hudes Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: multi-homing On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Dana Hudes wrote:The pressure is on to use co-location service only from Big Players. Indeed, remember the big fight over Exodus peering arrangements? Someone (GTE?) decided that Exodus should pay them for transit and pulled peering. since no other large network pulled such stunt the result was that GTE customers were inconvenienced more than Exodus customers. The message is loud and clear. If you want your server farm to have good access, put it in a good co-locationfacility in theUS run by (or connect your co-located equipment to) a very large provider who has good redundancy not only of their networkas a wholebut of their colo facility (a co-lo facility with only oneWAN circuitdoes not have good redundancy even if the LAN isexceedingly good andfault-tolerant etc.).I'd disagree whole-heartedly (partly because I am not a huge, national tier-1). Wouldn't you rather connect your equipment to a smaller company, that is potentially more flexible, has more clueful people, has better pricing, and is multihomed to maybe 3 or 6 or 9 backbones?
Current thread:
- multi-homing Dana Hudes (Dec 05)
- Re: multi-homing Alex Rubenstein (Dec 05)
- RE: multi-homing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 05)
- RE: multi-homing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 05)
- some implications of provider scaling Randy Bush (Dec 05)
- Re: some implications of provider scaling jlewis (Dec 05)
- RE: some implications of provider scaling Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 05)
- Anyone know of Colos available in New Orleans or Jacksonville David Diaz (Dec 06)
- RE: multi-homing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Dec 05)
- Re: multi-homing Alex Rubenstein (Dec 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multi-homing Sean Donelan (Dec 05)
- Re: multi-homing Jeremy Porter (Dec 05)
- Re: multi-homing Rich Braun (Dec 06)
- Re: multi-homing David Diaz (Dec 07)