nanog mailing list archives
Re: proper list for net abuse discussions?
From: TTSG <ttsg () ttsg com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 18:00:39 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, TTSG wrote:We were hoping that "Hack-Track" would be the forum. Check out http://www.hack-track.com for instructions.Shouldnt that be cracker-tracker. It might be excusable for techology illiterate journalists to misuse the term "hack" but its inexcusable for computer professionals.
I'd rather not get into a discussion about this, since as an "ex-hacker" from 1978.... To me "hacker" is computer, "cracker" is software. Tuc/TTSG
Current thread:
- proper list for net abuse discussions? Dan Hollis (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Ravi Pina (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? TTSG (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Dan Hollis (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? TTSG (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Rich Sena (Apr 03)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? bmanning (Apr 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: proper list for net abuse discussions? Dan Hollis (Apr 02)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Owen DeLong (Apr 03)
- Re: proper list for net abuse discussions? Sean Donelan (Apr 03)