nanog mailing list archives
Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET
From: Dean Anderson <dean () av8 com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 19:07:26 -0400
At 06:17 PM 9/22/98 -0400, Jeff Mcadams wrote:
Incidentally, we're straight into the router port and still using f/r encap. I'm not really sure of the reasoning behind this, but apparently, the edict came down from on high that all new turn-ups would use frame-relay encap...even if straight into a router port. *shrug*
I would speculate that the reason is that PVC's are easier to move around within a FR cloud, allowing one to reconfigure with less headache. Your T1 is moved to a new router or location with "just a PVC rebuild". --Dean ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Plain Aviation, Inc dean () av8 com LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP http://www.av8.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Current thread:
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET, (continued)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Charles Sprickman (Sep 21)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Alec H. Peterson (Sep 22)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Vijay Gill (Sep 22)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Deepak Jain (Sep 22)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET ken emery (Sep 22)
- RE: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Chris Fairbanks (Sep 22)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Jeff Mcadams (Sep 22)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Chris Wilson (Sep 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Jeff Mcadams (Sep 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Chris Wilson (Sep 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Jeff Mcadams (Sep 22)