nanog mailing list archives
FCC outage reports
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 15:06:44 -0500
Goldstein_William () bns ATt COM writes:
There IS a difference. The FCC keeps records of outages which must be reported by the carriers. It is worth checking these out.
I think there are some problems with how the FCC outage reports count things, but here goes.... FCC outage reports by year and inter-exchange carrier 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 AT&T 3 15 7 18 17 MCI 13 12 19 9 15 Sprint 3 11 3 12 9 WorldCom NA NA NA 7 13 There are all sorts of normalization problems, different reporting requirements (e.g. if you serve airports you have to report more outages), some carriers report only when the must, other carriers report anything even close to being reportable, and so on. Also, if you know how fiber swapping works, sometimes its luck of the draw who gets tapped when a shared right-of-way gets chopped. For overall trend analysis the FCC outage reports serve a useful purpose. But comparing one carrier to another is a different matter and I'd rather they not get turned into another Boardwatch fiasco with people manipulating their numbers. Note: I haven't gone to FCC reading room in Washington DC and counted the actual reports myself, these numbers are third-hand from one of the carriers salespeople. Caveat Emptor. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
Current thread:
- FCC outage reports Sean Donelan (Sep 18)
- Re: FCC outage reports Michael Shields (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: FCC outage reports Goldstein_William (Sep 18)
- Re: FCC outage reports Sean Donelan (Sep 19)