nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGPs in use


From: alex () nac net
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:48:40 -0400 (EDT)


I'd have to definatly disagree.

IGP wise, EIGRP is easy and fast and it works. If ou need a *lot* of
interoperability, use OSPF.

Friends don't let friends use BGP as an IGP


On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Megatron wrote:


I would say the most interior Routing Protocol that is out there is
BGP. It gives a better control of route announcements.

-Megatron


On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Andre' Zehl wrote:

Is there an overview on what the dominantly used interior routing
protocols are percentagewise in large AS backbones (IBGP, OSPF, IGRP,
EIGRP, IS-IS, any?). I don't want to start religous wars on what's the
best protocol, I'm rather interested if there is an overview available
on the facts of protocols used. Is there an "objective"
(vendor-independent) feature-based overview on the compared
advantages/disadvantages (especially regarding redistribution) of the
various protocols that goes with those numbers? > > Andre' > >
zehl () berkom de >



-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
   ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs.  October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA.
    Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and
    brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration.

     Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
       Alex Rubenstein, alex () nac net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
               Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
     Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone!  http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Current thread: