nanog mailing list archives
RE: Gigarouter
From: Greg Mirsky <gmirsky () nexabit com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:17:45 -0400
My apologies to those offended by my note. I wouldn't argue about terminology so much. If GRF and GSR get into Gigarouter category - fine with me and my sincere congrats to all. What I've ment was that, as you all know, there are M40 out there and it's only the beginning of new and exciting era. And it wasn't 'vendor's shpil'. Again, sorry and good luck in pumping these Gigabytes! Greg
-----Original Message----- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [SMTP:hcb () clark net] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 1998 11:05 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: Gigarouter Greg Mirsky observed,Rogerio, these are not REAL gigarouters. Real once yet to come ;). Stay tuned GregOr is it that the current ones are gigarouters, but the next generation will be terable?
Current thread:
- Gigarouter Rogerio Alvarez - DRS23 (Oct 15)
- Re: Gigarouter Nathan Stratton (Oct 15)
- Re: Gigarouter alex (Oct 15)
- Re: Gigarouter Neil J. McRae (Oct 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gigarouter Greg Mirsky (Oct 15)
- RE: Gigarouter Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 15)
- RE: Gigarouter David Diaz (Oct 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Gigarouter Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 16)
- RE: Gigarouter Howard C. Berkowitz (Oct 15)
- RE: Gigarouter Greg Mirsky (Oct 15)
- Re: Gigarouter David Greer (Oct 15)