nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGPs in use


From: Danny McPherson <danny () genuity net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:48:35 -0700


Just as with ISIS .. and most anything else.  In order to continue operating 
when it's "ceiling" is reached, network design and vendor implementation must 
be tailored (optimized) to accommodate shortcomings in the specific 
application.

I've seen one of these "theoretical" ceilings w/ISIS at a previous employer 
(one of the "big 5").  I guess you could say "allowing the glass to break 
wasn't an option".

-danny  

  Perhaps I'm forgetting something... Doesn't OSPF have a "glass
ceiling"..

Kind of like the current mboned issue's ?

  Routes, * states, * interfaces |  macs, * changes...... != scalable...

   Perhaps I am wrong.....   Anyone care to clarify ? 

   Or, should we limit our scope of the term "scalable"...
   In which case, OSPF is dynamite.



Current thread: