nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue an


From: Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 22:09:23 -0500

Gosh, this is exactly what my ten seconds of observation earlier this
afternoon told me.  And that's with ZERO connection to the entire Tonga
matter, except that I am (along with other NANOG readers) getting very
tired of your increasingly emotional and irrational claims.

Please take your ranting to domain-policy, which is a more appropriate
forum for your discussion.  This in about politics, not operations.

Stephen
(not my employer)


Barry Shein wrote:

But thank you for affirming that, as I said, the web page for the
Consulate of Tonga was changed today from an ad for a software company
to something to do with Tonga.


On October 2, 1998 at 09:15 egullich () tonic to (Eric Gullichsen) wrote:
 >
 > We recently moved a number of servers to a colocated facility
 > for improved bandwidth.  The mail POP for the Consulate was one of these,
 > and now runs on a machine supporting a number of virtual IP addresses.
 > There is no web page for the Consulate, and as a result of the fact that
 > there was no explicit VirtualHost directive for sfconsulate.gov.to
 > in the Apache config file, web accesses defaulted to another
 > virtual IP on the same machine, which is that of a software company.
 >
 > As a result of your discovering this, I recently added a VirtualHost
 > directive so that accesses to port 80 on the sfconsulate.gov.to IP address
 > return the Tonga Visitor's Bureau home page, www.vacations.tvb.gov.to
 > Thank you for pointing this out.
 >

-- 
     |          |         Stephen Sprunk, KD5DWP, CCIE #3723
    :|:        :|:        NSA, Network Consulting Engineer 
   :|||:      :|||:       14875 Landmark Blvd #400; Dallas, TX
.:|||||||:..:|||||||:.    Pager: 800-365-4578 / 800-901-6078
C I S C O S Y S T E M S   Email: ssprunk () cisco com


Current thread: