nanog mailing list archives

Re: About last smurf floods - additional info


From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 09:01:16 -0500

At 04:25 PM 11/25/98 +0300, Alex P. Rudnev wrote:

You are not right, everything should be done - clearing trojans from your 
servers, filtering frauded SRC addresses (most important issue), 
decreasing SMURF amplifyers, lawsuits agains the hackers. It's amazing, 
but we have not ANY official complain from foreign countries (foreign 
companies) through I have asked such complain any time I'v write about 
the broken system/network.

As aside, ingress filtering (a la RFC2267) or unicast RPF checks work
quite well in filtering out traffic originating from bogons.

Both of these are relatively simple to invoke.

The key issue here is that (it appears that) some networks are not
taking "socially responsible" actions beacuse of either (a) laziness,
(b) ignorance, or (c) both.

- paul



Current thread: