nanog mailing list archives
Re: Strange BGP announcement
From: Tony Li <tli () juniper net>
Date: 17 Nov 1998 17:09:25 -0800
patrick () ianai net (I Am Not An Isp) writes:
You said you wanted routers that followed the RFC. The RFC does not mention list AS_PATH length as a route selection criteria. I have been told that the draft for the next rev specifically prohibits using AS_PATH length as a route selection criteria.
Patently false. In particular, the spec allows an implementation to invoke local policy when computing the local preference of a route. An implementation can reasonably incorporate the AS path length in its local preference calculations as part of its policy. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Enke Chen (Nov 10)
- RE: Strange BGP announcement Winfried Haug (Nov 13)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Enke Chen (Nov 13)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Andrew Bangs (Nov 13)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement I Am Not An Isp (Nov 16)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Andrew Bangs (Nov 17)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement I Am Not An Isp (Nov 17)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Tony Li (Nov 17)
- AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) I Am Not An Isp (Nov 17)
- Re: AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) Tony Li (Nov 17)
- Re: AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) Ben Black (Nov 18)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Enke Chen (Nov 13)
- RE: Strange BGP announcement Winfried Haug (Nov 13)
- Re: Strange BGP announcement Vijay Gill (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) I Am Not An Isp (Nov 17)
- Re: AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) Vijay Gill (Nov 17)
- Re: AS_PATH length and route selection (WAS: Strange BGP announcement) Sean M. Doran (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Strange BGP announcement Martin, Christian (Nov 17)