nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN?
From: Dan Watts <dwatts () vitts com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 14:25:57 -0500
At 01:43 PM 11/9/98 -0500, you wrote:
There should also be no objection for listing all assigned /30 networks. I'm not talking about dial-up users -- but fully routed dedicated customers using only a /30 or more. I *WANT* to see these networks in whois lookups! These listings should be *required*.
I second this. One thing I would dearly love to see is support in client rwhois implementations for referrals. Today, if I query the root rwhois server at rwhois.net, I don't end up with a clear answer as to who the network block has been delegated. I have to manually try and find the rwhois server [if any] for the smallest block returned, and see if there are further delegations being made. At Vitts, we're attempting to document in our rwhois server, every network assignment we make. This includes the /30's. We have a handful of 1 IP customers that are connected to the Internet using a router running NAT or firewall software. It makes it easier for us to have a standards based way of identifying the owner for every IP address we manage. Dan -- Dan Watts Vitts Networks dwatts () vitts com
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: ARIN? Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 07)
- Re: ARIN? Andrea Di Lecce (Nov 06)
- Re: ARIN? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: ARIN? Kim Hubbard (Nov 08)
- Re: ARIN? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 08)
- Re: ARIN? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 09)
- Re: ARIN? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 09)
- Re: ARIN? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 09)
- Re: ARIN? Phil Howard (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? Owen DeLong (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? Jeff Mcadams (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? dirk (Nov 10)