RE: ingress filtering

[John Fraizer <John.Fraizer () EnterZone Net>]

At 08:57 AM 5/29/98 -0400, you wrote:
> > Actually it has nothing to do with WINS.  If all the ISP's would
> implement
>
> Bzzt.  Thank you for playing, though.  If it were not for WinS, there
> wouldn't
> be a second packet being sent, no matter what junk is the payload.

Thanks.  I knew I wasn't crazy and seriously doubted that my sniffer was
inventing these packets just to piss me off.

> Now I agree ISP's should do better DNS resolution, but every MS box
> plugged into
> the net sending a second packet adds up to a lot of junk packets eating
> up 
> expensive bandwidth.  MS catches the blunt of the critisizm because they
> are the
> only ones to have adopted such a lame networking scheme, and then forced
> it
> down others quotes.

As stated before:

[OverKill]:/# nslookup www.stefcam.com
Server:  NS1.ENTERZONE.NET
Address:  209.41.244.5

Name:    STEFCAM.COM
Address:  209.41.244.238
Aliases:  www.stefcam.com

[OverKill]:/# nslookup 209.41.244.238
Server:  NS1.ENTERZONE.NET
Address:  209.41.244.5

Name:    StefCAM.Com
Address:  209.41.244.238


By the way, Stronghold will refuse to bind to an address that does not
reverse so, I knew it was right even before the lookup.




-------
John Fraizer    (root)          |    __   _                 |
The System Administrator        |   / /  (_)__  __ ____  __ | The choice
mailto:root () EnterZone Net       |  / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / |  of a GNU
http://www.EnterZone.Net/       | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation
                     A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...