nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again?
From: Randy Bush <rbush () bainbridge verio net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 20:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
For some unknown reason, although IHETS has been allocated the entire traditional class B 165.138.0.0, they are announcing it as a partial 165.138.0.0/20. They could announce the entire /16. But they've chosen not too.
They are quite entitled to that choice. And we are entitled not to accept the route. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again?, (continued)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 29)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Kim Hubbard (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Kim Hubbard (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Michael Dillon (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Dean Robb (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Michael Dillon (May 28)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 29)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 31)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 31)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 31)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 31)
- Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again? Karl Denninger (May 30)