nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Great Exchange
From: shields () crosslink net (Michael Shields)
Date: 27 May 1998 22:34:18 +0000
In article <199805271744.NAA21312 () jekyll piermont com>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com> wrote:
In the long run, why are we assuming there will be locality of traffic? It is true that the old PSTN has locality of traffic, but it doesn't have flat rate pricing, or the usage patterns that the Internet has.
Why are you assuming that the Internet will continue to have non-distance-sensitive pricing, when it clearly has distance- sensitive costs (ultimately)? -- Shields, CrossLink.
Current thread:
- The Great Exchange Pickett, David (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 27)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Dillon (May 27)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Tom Perrine (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Al Reuben (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Tim Flavin (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Jeremy Porter (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Jim Dixon (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Mark Prior (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 27)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange John A. Tamplin (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Miquel van Smoorenburg (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)