RE: Fwd: FW: Removal from APNIC lists

[Jim Fleming <JimFleming () unety net>]

On Wednesday, May 20, 1998 10:29 AM, Eric Germann[SMTP:ekgermann () cctec com] wrote:
@North America != Asia Pacific
@

Are you saying that no router located in North America
advertises routes to blocks in any of the following ranges ?
In other words, if someone were to block the entire 202.x.x.x
range they would be assured they would not lose any contact
with North America ?

http://teckla.apnic.net/annual_reports/1997/resource_status.htm#c4_1

Percentage
Used
-------------------------
0%      61.x.x.x <-------- April 25, 1997
0%      169.208.x.x
0%      169.209.x.x
0%      169.210.x.x
0%      169.211.x.x
0%      169.212.x.x
0%      169.213.x.x
0%      169.214.x.x
0%      169.215.x.x
80%     202.x.x.x
80%     203.x.x.x
12%     210.x.x.x
12%     211.x.x.x

==========

Do 100% of the NANOG members refuse to advertise blocks
in the above ranges from facilities located in North America ?

-
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net/IPv8
IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM