nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html
From: Mark Kent <mark () mainstreet net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 09:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
[snip] One of our dialup customers wants to access his website in the 206.116.31.0/24 network at another provider. [snip] Anyways, my question is, are their any other ISPs/NSPs that follow the same guidelines. UUNet seems to honor it just fine, as does MCI. Is Sprint more hardnosed than most ?
That is the wrong question to ask. The real question is who has been handing out 206.116/16 like they were dealing cards? A quick look at the announcments and in whois.arin.net reveals a bunch of /24 spread out over Canada. Historically, and currently, the Canadians crowd the top of the Tony Bates cidr list. Why is that? -mark P.S. I see iSTAR has 206.116/16.... why don't they announce it?
Current thread:
- Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Mike Tancsa (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Stephen Schmidt (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Phillip Vandry (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Bryan Fullerton (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Jason L. Weisberger (May 06)
- NEW: ISP-CACHING Email Discussion for ISP's, Caching Systems Christopher Knight (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Mark Kent (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Michael Dillon (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Jared Mauch (May 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Lehrer, Neil (May 06)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Michael Gibson (May 07)
- Re: Routing Policy and http://rs.arin.net/ip-allocation.html Stephen Schmidt (May 06)