nanog mailing list archives
Re: secure router access
From: Nisar Ali <nia () ans net>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 15:54:22 +0000
i have used both kerberos and ssh for quite a while, though kerberos first, of course, as ssh is fairly new. each has its features, easy points, hard points. that's why i use 'em both, i guess.
i only played with kerberos to ciscos for a bit. works. i use ssh to junipers. works. i can imagine that router vendors see licensing issues between the two.
Only IOS 11.3, to my knowledge, has support for encrypted telnet session in the enterprise images. It would have been better to have that support in other images as well AND in service provider images also(in my opinion at least). nisar
Current thread:
- RE: Core router bakeoff?, (continued)
- RE: Core router bakeoff? GUESDON Herve CNET/DSE/ISS (May 11)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 12)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Brian Moore (May 11)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 14)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael Shields (May 14)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Dean Anderson (May 14)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 14)
- secure router access Perry E. Metzger (May 14)
- Re: secure router access Dean Anderson (May 14)
- Re: secure router access Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: secure router access Nisar Ali (May 15)
- Re: secure router access Jared Mauch (May 15)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 14)
- RE: Core router bakeoff? GUESDON Herve CNET/DSE/ISS (May 11)
- Re: secure router access Curtis Villamizar (May 27)
- Re: secure router access Perry E. Metzger (May 28)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Dean Anderson (May 14)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Andrew Bangs (May 14)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Alex P. Rudnev (May 14)