nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1.1.1.0/24


From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup () fnsi net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:50:24 -0400 (EDT)


So what are you saying here Sean?  We don't have a clue?  3/4 of the
Internet service providers must not have a clue then.  I don't belive I
have ever read anywhere that 1/8 or anything smaller wasn't a valid 
route.  

Maybe you would like to show what you have in your BGP tables for 12/8?
How about 9/8?
How about 24/8?
How about 32/8?
How about 44/8?

Do you want me to go on??

T..S

On Wed, 13 May 1998, Sean Donelan wrote:

Looks like PSInet is demonstrating their complete and total lack of clue
again.

Who has less of a clue?  A provider that announces a 1.1.1.0/24, or
a provider that listens to junk like 1.1.1.0/24?

It doesn't matter what junk is announced, *IF* you could get providers
not to listen to it.
-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
  Affiliation given for identification not representation



Current thread: