nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1.1.1.0/24


From: Ben Buxton <bb () zip com au>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 08:59:37 +1000

Can anyone enlighten me as to what happend i.e. to the 12.x.x.x range? It
seems to be sub-allocated by now, and I see a lot af routes out of that
range in my routing table originated by a couple of different providers.

Was there a change in policy? Is this into offical allocation by now?
Last but not least, for anyone inside that range: Any problems with prefix
length filters so far?

I'm not sure about 12/8, but recently 61/8 was allocated to APNIC
and we were probably the first to get allocated a /19 in this
address space.
A few providers were filtering at /8, but in pretty much all
cases a quick email to them got their filters changed.


-- 
Ben Buxton___bb () zip com.au_____    o    _          _--_|\   ZIP Internet P/L
Zip's Network Dude            /____|___|_)________/______\______________________
Carbon:   9270-4777                    | .        \_.--._*    Virtually
Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288    Paper: 92475276        v     the best :)


Current thread: