nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1.1.1.0/24
From: Ben Buxton <bb () zip com au>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 08:59:37 +1000
Can anyone enlighten me as to what happend i.e. to the 12.x.x.x range? It seems to be sub-allocated by now, and I see a lot af routes out of that range in my routing table originated by a couple of different providers. Was there a change in policy? Is this into offical allocation by now? Last but not least, for anyone inside that range: Any problems with prefix length filters so far?
I'm not sure about 12/8, but recently 61/8 was allocated to APNIC and we were probably the first to get allocated a /19 in this address space. A few providers were filtering at /8, but in pretty much all cases a quick email to them got their filters changed. -- Ben Buxton___bb () zip com.au_____ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip's Network Dude /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Carbon: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288 Paper: 92475276 v the best :)
Current thread:
- 1.1.1.0/24 SASAKI Kazuyoshi (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 John Fraizer - Administrator (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Klaus Landefeld (May 13)
- 12.0.0.0/8 Jay Borkenhagen (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Ben Buxton (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Ben Buxton (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 andrew khoo (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Klaus Landefeld (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Michael Dillon (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Jeremy Porter (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Michael Dillon (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 14)