nanog mailing list archives
RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX
From: Eric Germann <ekgermann () CCTEC COM>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 13:08:57 -0400
Err, buy decent hardware and it will. 400,000 hits per day. Six months with narry a hiccup. PPro 200 with 128MB RAM. Also, if you're looking for a Radius solution to interface with a real relational db, NT works out a LOT cheaper than Sybase or Oracle on Unix. Eric At 08:06 AM 5/8/98 -0400, jeyers () ialn com wrote:
Depends on the size of your network. "Scaleability and stability" and NT rarely go together... Jerry-----Original Message----- From: Martin, Christian [SMTP:CMartin () mercury balink com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 8:48 PM To: 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX All Ye NANOG readers, Does anyone use CiscoSecure ACS for NT to control router access? If so, has anyone used the UNIX one and done a comparison? I need to evaluate these tools as a replacement for the TACACS+ daemon available from Cisco. Any info would be appreciated, particularly scalability and stability. Regards, Christian
Current thread:
- CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Martin, Christian (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Eric Germann (May 08)
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX Greg A. Woods (May 08)
- RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX jeyers (May 08)